Ali Hammoudi
York University, Osgoode Hall Law School, Graduate Student
- University of Leeds, Law, Alumnusadd
- Law, History, Middle East Studies, Marxist theory, Iraqi History, British Imperial and Colonial History (1600 - ), and 13 moreCritical Legal Theory, Colonialism, Imperialism, Empire, Marxist Legal Theory, International Law, Labour Law, Postcolonial Studies, TWAIL - Third World Approaches to International Law, History of International Law, Law and Society, Legal Theory, and Socio-legal studiesedit
To cite this article: Ali Hammoudi (2016) The conjunctural in international law: the revolutionary struggle against semi-peripheral sovereignty in Iraq, Third World Quarterly, 37:11, 2028-2046, ABSTRACT This article will detail an event... more
To cite this article: Ali Hammoudi (2016) The conjunctural in international law: the revolutionary struggle against semi-peripheral sovereignty in Iraq, Third World Quarterly, 37:11, 2028-2046, ABSTRACT This article will detail an event of revolutionary action in the historiography of anti-colonial and anti-imperial struggle in Iraq, namely al-Wathba ('the leap') of 1948, utilising it as an example to address the limitations of the methodology and analysis of Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) scholarship. I will argue that there is a disconnect between notions of agency and structure in TWAIL analyses and that therefore TWAIL scholars should consider studying the conjunctures that allowed certain movements ample room to struggle against the imperialism of international law in the first place. I will use the example of the Wathba to illustrate how a conjunctural analysis may be undertaken, analysing its implications for the international legal order. I will then move to highlight the significance of labour to the conjuncture in question. Finally, I will demonstrate how events like the Wathba illuminate the transient and provisional nature of the foundations of international law, while emphasising its structural constraints.
Research Interests:
Abstract: This essay will analyze William Twining’s work from a post-colonial perspective. It will be argued that Twining is constrained by the structural limitations inherent in his ‘general jurisprudence,’ reflected in three aspects of... more
Abstract: This essay will analyze William Twining’s work from a post-colonial perspective. It will be argued that Twining is constrained by the structural limitations inherent in his ‘general jurisprudence,’ reflected in three aspects of his analysis: firstly, Twining appears to disregard the imperialistic historical roots of the Western legal tradition. Secondly, Twining’s definition of globalization, which marginalizes the economic dimensions of globalization, fails to grasp the important historical role of capitalism in the emergence of globalization, and how this affects his very understanding of 'space' and 'proximity'. Finally, this essay will end with an examination of the relationship between the attainment of knowledge and power relations in the context of the Third World. It will be shown that Twining disregards how Western representations of non-Western legal traditions could eventually develop into a discourse that ultimately perpetuates new forms of domination.
